|
Myrl Jeffcoat myrlj@jps.net 22 mars, 2005 10:27 Follow-up Studies by Plastic
Surgeons Because plastic surgeons on only occasionally track their patients’ recovery beyond a short time after surgery—more than a year or two is uncommon—many of those surgeons who used silicone-gel implants never knew that some of their patients developed silicone-related disorders later on. Additionally, in all the years that silicone implants have been
used, the American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (the
primary professional organization for board-certified plastic surgeons)
completed few surveys to ascertain patient satisfaction with implants.
Based on their findings in one specific survey, they claimed—and
aggressively publicized—a higher than 90 percent happiness level,
according to their promotional materials. The data was obtained via a
questionnaire mailed to women one, two, and three years following
implantation of their prostheses. In one USF study, however, the average
woman developed the onset of silicone disease symptoms about 4 ˝ years
after implantation. Thus, the findings of the Plastic Surgeon’s Society
did not address the medical condition of silicone recipients at the more
critical times of 5 to 10 years postoperatively and were therefore
incomplete. In contrast, a long-term prospective study is still sorely
needed to demonstrate implants’ safety and their effects on the health of
recipients. [pages 20-21 – retyped from “The Silicone Breast Implant
Controversy by Frank Vasey MD, and Josh Feldstein}
|