Myrl Jeffcoat myrlj@jps.net
18 mars, 2005 20:27
Secret justice hides
risks
Secrecy can kill, as Americans found out during the summer of
2000. For weeks, the news media were filled with stories of disastrous car
wrecks and deaths in the 1990s that were linked to some Firestone tires.
The company recalled 6.5 million tires - too late for the more than 200
people killed and the hundreds injured.
They may have died needlessly. Information about possible
safety defects had been locked in lawyers' files for years. Scores of
victims had sued Bridgestone/Firestone, and the tiremaker had settled -
but the terms were secret. Documents were suppressed at the company's
insistence, and lawyers couldn't discuss them.
Five years after the Firestone firestorm, similar conspiracies
of secrecy continue. Courts have allowed lawyers to seal evidence about
incompetent doctors, hazardous products and priests accused of child
abuse.
The secrecy proliferates because it benefits everyone involved
- everyone, of course, except ordinary Americans who may become the next
victims.
Defendants want records sealed so they can hide bad behavior.
Plaintiffs and their lawyers go along to avoid costly fights over
documents and to extract quicker, bigger settlements. Judges approve deals
to clear crowded calendars and to protect commercial interests or
defendants' privacy.
No one knows the breadth of the problem, precisely because many
secrets never find their way into the light. Yet, enough have surfaced to
demonstrate secrecy's deadly effect.
Among the dangers hidden:
•Abusive priests Catholic priests who sexually abused children
were concealed for decades with the help of courts. The Catholic Church
settled victims' lawsuits secretly and insisted on orders to seal
documents. Today, some courts are still protecting church secrets. In
2003, a Connecticut appeals court ruled that the court files in 23
sexual-abuse lawsuits filed against the Diocese of Bridgeport should
remain under wraps.
•Dangerous products. Courts across the nation have sealed
records in lawsuits involving everything from silicone breast implants to
drugs later taken off the market to vehicles involved in scores of fiery
crashes.
• Incompetent doctors. Several South Carolina doctors have
settled malpractice suits, one repeatedly, under deals that hide the facts
and exact amounts from prospective patients, according to The State
newspaper of Columbia, S.C.
About 30 states have laws or court rules to prevent hiding
records. But secrecy can take many slippery forms, and appellate courts
often undermine even strong rules. Court secrecy has many powerful
backers, including major corporations and defense
lawyers.
In California, 10 attempts to pass laws to prevent court
secrecy have failed. Now, state Assemblywoman Fran Pavley is trying again:
Her bill would prevent sealing "evidence concerning a public danger" that
is discovered during a lawsuit. Similar legislation is being considered in
Washington state.
Corporations, such as Bridgestone/Firestone, contend that
secrecy is needed to protect trade secrets. But judges can determine that
some documents remain sealed.
The justice system should protect the public. It has no valid
excuse for hiding information that might save someone from a child
molester or a deadly product.