Sandra laliberte s_laliberte_2001@yahoo.com
4 mars, 2007 21:28
To: catsrule0208-shop@yahoo.com
Response to email about Pierre Blais (2)
You know I know pretty much everything about him. Maybe you should look into why he was fired, it was because he spilled the beans on the breast implants, because he would not water down the reports on the unsafe implants, I will give you a suggestion why don't you go get the book called safety last by Nicholas Regush and then you will see what the government of Canada did when it came to Pierre.
You also do not know that he won one of the biggest awards ever paid out for wrongful dismissal.
Who are you by the way?
That would then explain to me and others your wanting to slam someone who I am going to add you don't know, nor do you know the entire story behind him and Health Canada.
When he gets accused of being a junk scientist or what he has to say is Junk Science I laugh at it.
What he knows on breast implants is far from Junk Science unfortunately the U.S. justice system is not intelligent enough to understand the issues surrounding the breast Implants and Canada is not any better.
When you look into others involved in this in wanting to smear people like him you only have to look to why it is happening.
Dow, Inamed and Mentor have gone to great lenghs to discredit anyone who dares talks against there faulty medical Devices so far so they spend millions on PR firms to get there grass root movements going to get women thinking they are safe they have a choice blah blah blah.
Junk science is what the Health regulatory agencies in both the U.S. and Canada have used to put this approval through that I do know it is fact.
I don't know why you dislike Blais but I can only assume you are someone who wants implants on the market so it seems justifiable to you to slam Pierre Blais.
Sandra
Did you know that Blais was fired from the department and heath welfare in Canada?
----- Original Message ----
From: Sandra laliberte <s_laliberte_2001@yahoo.com>
To: catsrule0208-shop@yahoo.com; Tony Lambert
<delphine1939@videotron.ca>
Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2007 6:32:38 PM
Subject: Response to email about Pierre Blais Regarding this email you sent to Tony not only do we know what Dr. Blais is but we put a lot of weight.
Regarding this email you sent to Tony not only do we know what Dr. Blais is but we put a lot
of weight into what he says because he is right. We understand junk science and that is what the manufacturers put out JUNK!!
I find it interesting that you don't think that the chemists who health Canada and the FDA put on there panels are junk sciences, but then again they as chemists must be viewed differently because they sat on the panel voting to approve the implants. Pierre Blais knows more on these implants than any plastic surgeon so quite frankly what the U.S. courts say is immaterial to me and many others.
Sandra
From: catsrule0208-shop@yahoo.com
To: adellaem@shaw.ca ; delphine1939@videotron.ca
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2007 11:39 AM
Subject: Breast Implant / Blais
Before putting too much weight into Dr. Blais opinions, your readers might want to investigate the multiple times that Dr. Blais testimony was excluded as "junk science" in state and federal courts throughout the country. You may confirm this at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/ Most recently, in the case of Alfred v Mentor, Western District of KY February 2007. Dr. Blais in not a medical doctor he
