SidRavkind@aol.com SidRavkind@aol.com
19 mars, 2007 11:00
CAC Lied
I didn't recognize several of the email addresses you purported to respond to on March 12, 2007, but because your email is misleading I decided to include them here:
Since my emails plainly dealt with disease claims (the two emails from SF/DCT to Linda Dintino related to her disease claim), and your response dealt with rupture claims, perhaps you will now explain how we are now two years behind the projected completion date CAC estimated in late 2005.
As far as my action or inaction is concerned, I don't perceive that my filing a Motion with the court asking that CAC get off its collective ass would accomplish much. Further, we're talking about you not me. You further state that you believe I have never handled the trial of an implant case.
Wrong:
I was lead counsel in the Dallas case against Dow that was tried in 1995. The multimillion dollar verdict in that case convinced Dow to seek bankruptcy -- so I was told by Dow's lawyers. After 1997, I believe I was the only lawyer who was willing to take a case to trial. Most went to adverse verdict (the clients declined my advice to settle for a fair amount during trial). But I never refuse a client's request to try her case. Dumb me, right. In recent years I have provided free consultation to a number of unrepresented client without charge or expectation of payment. So much for my experience.How about answering my inquiries. --
Sidney Ravkind
